Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 4
Its director stated on the record that "ego is obviously a central thesis of The Menu in terms of it being a corrosive factor in the work of any artist, The film has that social bite to it — it's not…" 1. Its writer stated on the record that "we're exploring entitlement and how people tend to consume and consume and consume content kind of mindlessly without considering how difficult it is to produc…" 2. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 3. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 12 of 100 4.
- 1Creator statementdirector: "Ego is obviously a central thesis of The Menu in terms of it being a corrosive factor in the work of any artist. The film has that social bite to it — it's not quite as straightforward as 'eat the ri…"Deadline, December 2022 source ↗
- 2Creator statementwriter: "We're exploring entitlement and how people tend to consume and consume and consume content kind of mindlessly without considering how difficult it is to produce that content and failing to be thankfu…"Script Magazine / Above the Line, December 2022 source ↗
- 3Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
- 4Content balanceAdvocacy 12 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 65 — leans mature
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience withheld
Only 75% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.
Why this is blank
A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Where to Watch (US)
fuboTV
YouTube TV
FXNow
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAmazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At HomeSynopsis
A young couple travels to a remote island to eat at an exclusive restaurant where the chef has prepared a lavish menu, with some shocking surprises.
What did the audience think? Rate The Menu — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Comedy
The average advocacy score of Comedy titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1914 | 0 | 2 |
| 1925 | 0 | 3 |
| 1931 | 2 | 2 |
| 1933 | 0 | 2 |
| 1935 | 0 | 4 |
| 1937 | 0 | 2 |
| 1940 | 2 | 4 |
| 1941 | 0 | 2 |
| 1943 | 0 | 2 |
| 1944 | 2 | 6 |
| 1945 | 0 | 4 |
| 1947 | 0 | 2 |
| 1948 | 2 | 2 |
| 1950 | 2 | 4 |
| 1951 | 0 | 2 |
| 1952 | 0 | 4 |
| 1953 | 0 | 10 |
| 1955 | 5 | 2 |
| 1956 | 3 | 3 |
| 1957 | 5 | 4 |
| 1958 | 0 | 6 |
| 1959 | 4 | 3 |
| 1960 | 2 | 5 |
| 1961 | 5 | 10 |
| 1962 | 1 | 6 |
| 1963 | 1 | 6 |
| 1964 | 3 | 8 |
| 1965 | 1 | 9 |
| 1966 | 1 | 6 |
| 1968 | 0 | 7 |
| 1969 | 6 | 5 |
| 1970 | 3 | 7 |
| 1971 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 1 | 6 |
| 1973 | 1 | 9 |
| 1974 | 1 | 8 |
| 1975 | 0 | 9 |
| 1976 | 1 | 12 |
| 1977 | 4 | 7 |
| 1978 | 2 | 4 |
| 1979 | 1 | 8 |
| 1980 | 1 | 7 |
| 1981 | 1 | 9 |
| 1982 | 5 | 10 |
| 1983 | 1 | 12 |
| 1984 | 2 | 10 |
| 1985 | 3 | 14 |
| 1986 | 0 | 20 |
| 1987 | 0 | 17 |
| 1988 | 1 | 13 |
| 1989 | 2 | 24 |
| 1990 | 1 | 21 |
| 1991 | 1 | 14 |
| 1992 | 0 | 17 |
| 1993 | 1 | 20 |
| 1994 | 5 | 25 |
| 1995 | 3 | 19 |
| 1996 | 4 | 15 |
| 1997 | 2 | 22 |
| 1998 | 3 | 24 |
| 1999 | 3 | 36 |
| 2000 | 3 | 33 |
| 2001 | 1 | 31 |
| 2002 | 1 | 32 |
| 2003 | 2 | 29 |
| 2004 | 2 | 40 |
| 2005 | 4 | 41 |
| 2006 | 2 | 44 |
| 2007 | 1 | 53 |
| 2008 | 0 | 20 |
| 2009 | 4 | 18 |
| 2010 | 2 | 10 |
| 2011 | 2 | 21 |
| 2012 | 1 | 10 |
| 2013 | 10 | 13 |
| 2014 | 5 | 11 |
| 2015 | 4 | 7 |
| 2016 | 17 | 10 |
| 2017 | 6 | 7 |
| 2018 | 10 | 12 |
| 2019 | 7 | 16 |
| 2020 | 6 | 19 |
| 2021 | 9 | 19 |
| 2022 | 20 | 22 |
| 2023 | 22 | 11 |
| 2024 | 12 | 17 |
| 2025 | 2 | 23 |
| 2026 | 2 | 36 |
| This title (2022) | 12 | 1 |
● This title (2022): advocacy 12 · explore Comedy →
Cast & Crew
Chloe Weaver (director) · Kate Smith (director)
Made for the Same Audience
Titles with the closest audience-sphere profile — not just the same genre.
Same Audience, Lower Advocacy
Made for a similar audience but scored lower on advocacy — the closest less-message-driven picks, ranked by audience-sphere proximity.
Related Titles
