Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 6
Its showrunner stated on the record that "i think it's important in Hollywood to be inclusive, and have as much diversity and representation as possible, We had an Islamic female writer on staff and se…" 1. Its showrunner stated on the record that "we wanted to be sure that we were telling a story about a bad guy, not about a bad culture, We wanted to humanise our bad guy, particularly since he was a Midd…" 2. Its showrunner stated on the record that "any great villain is kind of the hero in his own mind, is complicated and layered, I felt like there wasn't a huge difference between them, and their goals and…" 3. Muslim Public Affairs Council Hollywood Bureau is documented as involved through consulting 4. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 5. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 17 of 100 6. Relative to the expected cast make-up for its production origin, on-screen representation registers above the baseline for Black 7.
- 1Creator statementshowrunner: "I think it's important in Hollywood to be inclusive, and have as much diversity and representation as possible. We had an Islamic female writer on staff and several Islamic consultants who read the s…"Variety, Series Mania Masterclass, 2018 source ↗
- 2Creator statementshowrunner: "We wanted to be sure that we were telling a story about a bad guy, not about a bad culture. We wanted to humanise our bad guy, particularly since he was a Middle Eastern terrorist. His wife is a very…"Variety, Series Mania Masterclass, 2018 source ↗
- 3Creator statementshowrunner: "Any great villain is kind of the hero in his own mind, is complicated and layered. I felt like there wasn't a huge difference between them, and their goals and what they wanted for their families and…"The Wrap, 2018 source ↗
- 4Advocacy orgMuslim Public Affairs Council Hollywood Bureau involved via consulting; evidence type confirmed_reporting.Muslim Public Affairs Council Hollywood Bureau (advocacy group) source ↗
- 5Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
- 6Content balanceAdvocacy 17 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
- 7RepresentationRepresentation vs production-origin baseline: Black 68.WhatSphere representation model, score_version 1
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 46 — age-balanced
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Where to Watch (US)
Synopsis
When CIA analyst Jack Ryan stumbles upon a suspicious series of bank transfers his search for answers pulls him from the safety of his desk job and catapults him into a deadly game of cat and mouse throughout Europe and the Middle East, with a rising terrorist figurehead preparing for a massive attack against the US and her allies.
What did the audience think? Rate Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Action
The average advocacy score of Action titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 3 | 2 |
| 1965 | 4 | 3 |
| 1966 | 0 | 4 |
| 1968 | 2 | 2 |
| 1970 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 0 | 4 |
| 1972 | 3 | 2 |
| 1973 | 2 | 9 |
| 1975 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 4 | 2 |
| 1979 | 2 | 3 |
| 1980 | 4 | 5 |
| 1981 | 4 | 3 |
| 1982 | 1 | 5 |
| 1983 | 3 | 7 |
| 1984 | 4 | 11 |
| 1985 | 2 | 7 |
| 1986 | 2 | 10 |
| 1987 | 2 | 14 |
| 1988 | 1 | 4 |
| 1989 | 1 | 10 |
| 1990 | 1 | 5 |
| 1991 | 1 | 9 |
| 1992 | 2 | 8 |
| 1993 | 2 | 11 |
| 1994 | 2 | 14 |
| 1995 | 3 | 11 |
| 1996 | 1 | 9 |
| 1997 | 4 | 13 |
| 1998 | 2 | 10 |
| 1999 | 3 | 13 |
| 2000 | 1 | 11 |
| 2001 | 2 | 20 |
| 2002 | 3 | 17 |
| 2003 | 4 | 14 |
| 2004 | 3 | 19 |
| 2005 | 4 | 18 |
| 2006 | 3 | 23 |
| 2007 | 3 | 18 |
| 2008 | 3 | 22 |
| 2009 | 4 | 9 |
| 2010 | 7 | 8 |
| 2011 | 5 | 12 |
| 2012 | 9 | 10 |
| 2013 | 7 | 16 |
| 2014 | 10 | 9 |
| 2015 | 10 | 16 |
| 2016 | 20 | 9 |
| 2017 | 14 | 17 |
| 2018 | 15 | 20 |
| 2019 | 16 | 18 |
| 2020 | 14 | 13 |
| 2021 | 14 | 25 |
| 2022 | 20 | 32 |
| 2023 | 17 | 25 |
| 2024 | 12 | 32 |
| 2025 | 5 | 35 |
| 2026 | 5 | 30 |
| This title (2018) | 17 | 1 |
● This title (2018): advocacy 17 · explore Action →