Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 3
Its creator/host stated on the record that "i don't want anyone to look bad, I want to be the fool" 1. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 2. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 9 of 100 3.
- 1Creator statementcreator/host: "I don't want anyone to look bad. I want to be the fool."Interview Magazine source ↗
- 2Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
- 3Content balanceAdvocacy 9 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 40 — leans younger
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience withheld
Only 50% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.
Why this is blank
A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Where to Watch (US)
HBO Max
HBO Max Amazon Channel
Paramount Plus Premium
Paramount Plus Essential
Paramount Plus Apple TV Channel 
Paramount+ Amazon Channel
Paramount+ Roku Premium Channel
Hoopla
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
Fandango At HomeSynopsis
Self-proclaimed business expert, writer, director and comedian Nathan Fielder helps real small businesses turn a profit with marketing tactics that no ordinary consultant would dare to attempt. From driving foot traffic to an off-the-strip souvenir shop by using Hollywood flair and a Johnny Depp impersonator, to creating a rebate that can only be redeemed by climbing a mountain, to founding a coffee shop called "Dumb Starbucks,” Nathan has always gone to the limit to make his ideas come to life. With his unorthodox approach to problem solving, Nathan’s genuine efforts to do good often draw the real people he encounters into an experience far beyond what they signed up for.
What did the audience think? Rate Nathan for You — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Comedy
The average advocacy score of Comedy titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1914 | 0 | 2 |
| 1925 | 0 | 3 |
| 1931 | 2 | 2 |
| 1933 | 0 | 2 |
| 1935 | 0 | 4 |
| 1937 | 0 | 2 |
| 1940 | 2 | 4 |
| 1941 | 0 | 2 |
| 1943 | 0 | 2 |
| 1944 | 2 | 6 |
| 1945 | 0 | 4 |
| 1947 | 0 | 2 |
| 1948 | 2 | 2 |
| 1950 | 2 | 4 |
| 1951 | 0 | 2 |
| 1952 | 0 | 4 |
| 1953 | 0 | 10 |
| 1955 | 5 | 2 |
| 1956 | 3 | 3 |
| 1957 | 5 | 4 |
| 1958 | 0 | 6 |
| 1959 | 4 | 3 |
| 1960 | 2 | 5 |
| 1961 | 5 | 10 |
| 1962 | 1 | 6 |
| 1963 | 1 | 6 |
| 1964 | 3 | 8 |
| 1965 | 1 | 9 |
| 1966 | 1 | 6 |
| 1968 | 0 | 7 |
| 1969 | 6 | 5 |
| 1970 | 3 | 7 |
| 1971 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 1 | 6 |
| 1973 | 1 | 9 |
| 1974 | 1 | 8 |
| 1975 | 0 | 9 |
| 1976 | 1 | 12 |
| 1977 | 4 | 7 |
| 1978 | 2 | 4 |
| 1979 | 1 | 8 |
| 1980 | 1 | 7 |
| 1981 | 1 | 9 |
| 1982 | 5 | 10 |
| 1983 | 1 | 12 |
| 1984 | 2 | 10 |
| 1985 | 3 | 14 |
| 1986 | 0 | 20 |
| 1987 | 0 | 17 |
| 1988 | 1 | 13 |
| 1989 | 2 | 24 |
| 1990 | 1 | 21 |
| 1991 | 1 | 14 |
| 1992 | 0 | 17 |
| 1993 | 1 | 20 |
| 1994 | 5 | 25 |
| 1995 | 3 | 19 |
| 1996 | 4 | 15 |
| 1997 | 2 | 22 |
| 1998 | 3 | 24 |
| 1999 | 3 | 36 |
| 2000 | 3 | 33 |
| 2001 | 1 | 31 |
| 2002 | 1 | 32 |
| 2003 | 2 | 29 |
| 2004 | 2 | 40 |
| 2005 | 4 | 41 |
| 2006 | 2 | 44 |
| 2007 | 1 | 53 |
| 2008 | 0 | 20 |
| 2009 | 4 | 18 |
| 2010 | 2 | 10 |
| 2011 | 2 | 21 |
| 2012 | 1 | 10 |
| 2013 | 10 | 13 |
| 2014 | 5 | 11 |
| 2015 | 4 | 7 |
| 2016 | 17 | 10 |
| 2017 | 6 | 7 |
| 2018 | 10 | 12 |
| 2019 | 7 | 16 |
| 2020 | 6 | 19 |
| 2021 | 9 | 19 |
| 2022 | 20 | 22 |
| 2023 | 22 | 11 |
| 2024 | 12 | 17 |
| 2025 | 2 | 23 |
| 2026 | 2 | 36 |
| This title (2013) | 9 | 1 |
● This title (2013): advocacy 9 · explore Comedy →
Cast & Crew
Made for the Same Audience
Titles with the closest audience-sphere profile — not just the same genre.
Same Audience, Lower Advocacy
Made for a similar audience but scored lower on advocacy — the closest less-message-driven picks, ranked by audience-sphere proximity.
Related Titles
