Audience evidenceThe verdict — who this is for, by the receipts

Made first for young men 1

Hoppers's audience scores lean most toward young men at 95 of 100, with comparable appeal to young women 1. Its overall reach is rated targeted — targeted reach aimed at a specific demographic segment 2. On content balance it reads entertainment-first at 0 of 100, weighting storytelling over explicit messaging 3.

The receipts — every claim above is sourced
  1. 1
    Audience scoreyoung men 95 of 100 is the top quadrant, with young women 84 close behind.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
  2. 2
    ReachAudience breadth rated targeted.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
  3. 3
    Content balanceContent balance entertainment-first at 0 of 100.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1

WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.

Data updated July 31, 2026Scored, pending verification.Think a score is wrong? Submit a correction.
Primary audienceYoung MenYoung Men95
Young MaleYoung FemaleMature MaleMature Female
Primary audienceYoung Men
Targeted

Quadrant Scores

Young Men
95
Young Women
84
Older Men
16
Older Women
5
Loading factors...

Audience Representation

Racial audience withheld

Only 60% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.

Why this is blank

A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.

LGBTQ+
0

Faithfulness

Faithfulness not applicable

Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.

Why this is blank

An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.

Advocacy

Advocacy0
Entertainment

Synopsis

Scientists have discovered how to 'hop' human consciousness into lifelike robotic animals, allowing people to communicate with animals as animals. Animal lover Mabel seizes an opportunity to use the technology, uncovering mysteries within the animal world beyond anything she could have imagined.


What did the audience think? Rate Hoppers — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.

Lineage and popularity

No lineage or popularity yet

This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.

Compare Hoppers

Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.

Compare with…

Advocacy Over Time in Adventure

The average advocacy score of Adventure titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.

25507519522026
Average advocacy score of Adventure titles by release year
YearAverage advocacyTitles
195202
195982
196002
196313
196623
196832
197224
197312
197535
197832
197932
198132
198224
198343
198428
198562
198603
198734
198802
198935
199023
199122
199202
199323
199434
199564
199603
199749
199834
199919
200029
200168
2002310
200378
2004411
2005311
2006211
2007212
200847
200968
2010710
2011410
2012116
2013512
2014711
2015812
2016812
20171013
2018923
20191328
2020919
20211033
20221627
20231431
2024836
2025123
2026424
This title (2026)01

● This title (2026): advocacy 0 · explore Adventure →

Cast & Crew

Daniel Chong (director) · Ian Megibben (director) · Jeremy Lasky (director)