Made first for older women 1
The Secret Life of Words's audience scores lean most toward older women at 65 of 100 1. Its overall reach is rated mainstream — mainstream, general-audience reach 2. Relative to the expected cast make-up for its production origin, on-screen representation registers above the baseline for White and mixed-heritage and below it for Hispanic and Asian 3. On content balance it reads entertainment-first at 9 of 100, weighting storytelling over explicit messaging 4.
- 1Audience scoreolder women 65 of 100 is the top quadrant.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 2ReachAudience breadth rated mainstream.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 3RepresentationRepresentation vs production-origin baseline: White 86, mixed-heritage 79, Hispanic 31, Asian 31.WhatSphere representation model, score_version 1
- 4Content balanceContent balance entertainment-first at 9 of 100.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 56 — leans mature
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Where to Watch (US)
Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Kanopy
Hoopla
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAmazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At HomeSynopsis
A solitary nurse bonds with a badly burned patient who survived an accident on an oil rig.
What did the audience think? Rate The Secret Life of Words — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Romance
The average advocacy score of Romance titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1925 | 0 | 2 |
| 1931 | 1 | 3 |
| 1932 | 0 | 2 |
| 1935 | 0 | 4 |
| 1936 | 0 | 2 |
| 1939 | 9 | 2 |
| 1940 | 2 | 3 |
| 1942 | 0 | 5 |
| 1944 | 2 | 2 |
| 1945 | 1 | 3 |
| 1946 | 1 | 3 |
| 1952 | 0 | 3 |
| 1953 | 0 | 3 |
| 1955 | 3 | 3 |
| 1956 | 4 | 4 |
| 1957 | 2 | 4 |
| 1958 | 1 | 3 |
| 1959 | 5 | 2 |
| 1960 | 0 | 2 |
| 1961 | 5 | 3 |
| 1962 | 2 | 2 |
| 1963 | 0 | 2 |
| 1964 | 4 | 4 |
| 1965 | 3 | 3 |
| 1968 | 2 | 3 |
| 1970 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 3 | 3 |
| 1976 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 4 | 2 |
| 1980 | 2 | 3 |
| 1981 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 2 | 4 |
| 1984 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 4 | 4 |
| 1986 | 3 | 5 |
| 1987 | 4 | 5 |
| 1988 | 2 | 9 |
| 1990 | 2 | 8 |
| 1991 | 5 | 4 |
| 1992 | 1 | 5 |
| 1993 | 2 | 7 |
| 1994 | 8 | 9 |
| 1995 | 1 | 5 |
| 1996 | 4 | 9 |
| 1997 | 5 | 8 |
| 1998 | 5 | 6 |
| 1999 | 2 | 14 |
| 2000 | 3 | 18 |
| 2001 | 3 | 17 |
| 2002 | 3 | 15 |
| 2003 | 3 | 10 |
| 2004 | 3 | 16 |
| 2005 | 6 | 18 |
| 2006 | 3 | 14 |
| 2007 | 1 | 13 |
| 2008 | 3 | 7 |
| 2009 | 2 | 5 |
| 2010 | 5 | 4 |
| 2011 | 4 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 9 | 2 |
| 2014 | 2 | 3 |
| 2015 | 2 | 3 |
| 2016 | 7 | 6 |
| 2017 | 16 | 3 |
| 2018 | 9 | 3 |
| 2019 | 15 | 6 |
| 2020 | 15 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2 | 4 |
| 2022 | 22 | 3 |
| 2023 | 23 | 5 |
| 2024 | 2 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7 | 7 |
| 2026 | 4 | 13 |
| This title (2005) | 9 | 1 |
● This title (2005): advocacy 9 · explore Romance →
Cast & Crew
Jean-Claude Larrieu (director) · Isabel Coixet (director)
Made for the Same Audience
Titles with the closest audience-sphere profile — not just the same genre.
Same Audience, Lower Advocacy
Made for a similar audience but scored lower on advocacy — the closest less-message-driven picks, ranked by audience-sphere proximity.
Related Titles
