Made first for young women 1
Practical Magic 2's audience scores lean most toward young women at 100 of 100, with comparable appeal to older women 1. Its overall reach is rated targeted — targeted reach aimed at a specific demographic segment 2. On content balance it reads entertainment-first at 0 of 100, weighting storytelling over explicit messaging 3.
- 1Audience scoreyoung women 100 of 100 is the top quadrant, with older women 89 close behind.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 2ReachAudience breadth rated targeted.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 3Content balanceContent balance entertainment-first at 0 of 100.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 44 — leans younger
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience withheld
Only 55% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.
Why this is blank
A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Synopsis
The Owens sisters must confront the dark curse that threatens to unravel their family once and for all.
What did the audience think? Rate Practical Magic 2 — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Romance
The average advocacy score of Romance titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1925 | 0 | 2 |
| 1931 | 1 | 3 |
| 1932 | 0 | 2 |
| 1935 | 0 | 4 |
| 1936 | 0 | 2 |
| 1939 | 9 | 2 |
| 1940 | 2 | 3 |
| 1942 | 0 | 5 |
| 1944 | 2 | 2 |
| 1945 | 1 | 3 |
| 1946 | 1 | 3 |
| 1952 | 0 | 3 |
| 1953 | 0 | 3 |
| 1955 | 3 | 3 |
| 1956 | 4 | 4 |
| 1957 | 2 | 4 |
| 1958 | 1 | 3 |
| 1959 | 5 | 2 |
| 1960 | 0 | 2 |
| 1961 | 5 | 3 |
| 1962 | 2 | 2 |
| 1963 | 0 | 2 |
| 1964 | 4 | 4 |
| 1965 | 3 | 3 |
| 1968 | 2 | 3 |
| 1970 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 3 | 3 |
| 1976 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 4 | 2 |
| 1980 | 2 | 3 |
| 1981 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 2 | 4 |
| 1984 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 4 | 4 |
| 1986 | 3 | 5 |
| 1987 | 4 | 5 |
| 1988 | 2 | 9 |
| 1990 | 2 | 8 |
| 1991 | 5 | 4 |
| 1992 | 1 | 5 |
| 1993 | 2 | 7 |
| 1994 | 8 | 9 |
| 1995 | 1 | 5 |
| 1996 | 4 | 9 |
| 1997 | 5 | 8 |
| 1998 | 5 | 6 |
| 1999 | 2 | 14 |
| 2000 | 3 | 18 |
| 2001 | 3 | 17 |
| 2002 | 3 | 15 |
| 2003 | 3 | 10 |
| 2004 | 3 | 16 |
| 2005 | 6 | 18 |
| 2006 | 3 | 14 |
| 2007 | 1 | 13 |
| 2008 | 3 | 7 |
| 2009 | 2 | 5 |
| 2010 | 5 | 4 |
| 2011 | 4 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 9 | 2 |
| 2014 | 2 | 3 |
| 2015 | 2 | 3 |
| 2016 | 7 | 6 |
| 2017 | 16 | 3 |
| 2018 | 9 | 3 |
| 2019 | 15 | 6 |
| 2020 | 15 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2 | 4 |
| 2022 | 22 | 3 |
| 2023 | 23 | 5 |
| 2024 | 2 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7 | 7 |
| 2026 | 4 | 13 |
| This title (2026) | 0 | 1 |
● This title (2026): advocacy 0 · explore Romance →
Cast & Crew
Valdemar Winge Leisner (director) · Julian Spencer (director)
Made for the Same Audience
Titles with the closest audience-sphere profile — not just the same genre.
Related Titles
