Research evidenceResearch evidence — scores and sourced research

Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 4

Its actor stated on the record that "i didn't want to waste an opportunity when it came to what Nomi might represent, I searched for at least one moment in the script where Black audience members…" 1. Its actor stated on the record that "look, we're having a conversation about Phoebe's gender here, which is fucking ridiculous, She's a great writer, Why shouldn't we get Phoebe onto Bond, I had m…" 2. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 3. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 10 of 100 4. Relative to the expected cast make-up for its production origin, on-screen representation registers above the baseline for Middle Eastern and below it for White 5.

The receipts — every claim above is sourced
  1. 1
    Creator statementactor: "I didn't want to waste an opportunity when it came to what Nomi might represent. I searched for at least one moment in the script where Black audience members would nod their heads, tutting at the re…"IndieWire, October 2021 source ↗
  2. 2
    Creator statementactor: "Look, we're having a conversation about Phoebe's gender here, which is fucking ridiculous. She's a great writer. Why shouldn't we get Phoebe onto Bond? I had my eye on her ever since the first Fleaba…"Pajiba / Sunday Times interview, 2019 source ↗
  3. 3
    Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
  4. 4
    Content balanceAdvocacy 10 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
  5. 5
    RepresentationRepresentation vs production-origin baseline: Middle Eastern 80, White 15.WhatSphere representation model, score_version 1

WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.

Data updated March 13, 2026Scored, pending verification.Think a score is wrong? Submit a correction.
Primary audienceYoung MenYoung Men87
Young MaleYoung FemaleMature MaleMature Female
Primary audienceYoung Men
Targeted

Quadrant Scores

Young Men
87
Young Women
39
Older Men
61
Older Women
13
Loading factors...

Audience Representation

White
15
Black
58
Hispanic
52
Asian
40
South Asian
42
Middle Eastern
80
Indigenous
50
Mixed
44
Other
48
LGBTQ+
0

Faithfulness

Faithfulness not applicable

Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.

Why this is blank

An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.

Advocacy

Advocacy10
Entertainment

Where to Watch (US)

Stream
NetflixNetflixNetflix Standard with AdsNetflix Standard with Ads
Rent
Amazon VideoAmazon VideoApple TV StoreApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeYouTubeFandango At HomeFandango At HomePlexPlex
Buy
Amazon VideoAmazon VideoApple TV StoreApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeYouTubeFandango At HomeFandango At Home

View streaming options ↗

Synopsis

Bond has left active service and is enjoying a tranquil life in Jamaica. His peace is short-lived when his old friend Felix Leiter from the CIA turns up asking for help. The mission to rescue a kidnapped scientist turns out to be far more treacherous than expected, leading Bond onto the trail of a mysterious villain armed with dangerous new technology.

Score version: v1Data confidence: 100%How are scores calculated?

What did the audience think? Rate No Time to Die — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.

Lineage and popularity

No lineage or popularity yet

This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.

Compare No Time to Die

Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.

Compare with…

Advocacy Over Time in Action

The average advocacy score of Action titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.

25507519642026
Average advocacy score of Action titles by release year
YearAverage advocacyTitles
196432
196543
196604
196822
197002
197104
197232
197329
197503
197742
197923
198045
198143
198215
198337
1984411
198527
1986210
1987214
198814
1989110
199015
199119
199228
1993211
1994214
1995311
199619
1997413
1998210
1999313
2000111
2001220
2002317
2003414
2004319
2005418
2006323
2007318
2008322
200949
201078
2011512
2012910
2013716
2014109
20151016
2016209
20171417
20181520
20191618
20201413
20211425
20222032
20231725
20241232
2025535
2026530
This title (2021)101

● This title (2021): advocacy 10 · explore Action →

Cast & Crew

Luke Whitelock (director) · Matthew Sharp (director)