Research evidenceResearch evidence — scores and sourced research

Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 5

Its producer stated on the record that "we wanted to bring out a movie purely designed as entertainment, It's what I've been doing my whole career" 1. Its actor/producer stated on the record that "i'm not gonna try to top it; I just want to be authentic to the story that we're telling" 2. Its director stated on the record that "is there another story that is compelling enough that we need to go back, That's the bar we set for ourselves" 3. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 4. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 13 of 100 5. Relative to the expected cast make-up for its production origin, on-screen representation registers above the baseline for White and below it for Hispanic 6.

The receipts — every claim above is sourced
  1. 1
    Creator statementproducer: "We wanted to bring out a movie purely designed as entertainment. It's what I've been doing my whole career."IndieWire, 2022 source ↗
  2. 2
    Creator statementactor/producer: "I'm not gonna try to top it; I just want to be authentic to the story that we're telling."USS Midway World Premiere, 2022 source ↗
  3. 3
    Creator statementdirector: "Is there another story that is compelling enough that we need to go back? That's the bar we set for ourselves."Deadline, January 2023 source ↗
  4. 4
    Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
  5. 5
    Content balanceAdvocacy 13 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Swaps: 0 race, 0 gender, 0 critical -> 0
  6. 6
    RepresentationRepresentation vs production-origin baseline: White 74, Hispanic 33.WhatSphere representation model, score_version 1

WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.

Data updated March 1, 2026Scored, pending verification.Think a score is wrong? Submit a correction.
Primary audienceYoung MenYoung Men100
Young MaleYoung FemaleMature MaleMature Female
Primary audienceYoung Men
Targeted

Quadrant Scores

Young Men
100
Young Women
19
Older Men
81
Older Women
0
Loading factors...

Audience Representation

White
74
Black
48
Hispanic
33
Asian
56
South Asian
46
Middle Eastern
48
Indigenous
48
Mixed
48
Other
48
LGBTQ+
0

Faithfulness

Faithfulness not applicable

Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.

Why this is blank

An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.

Advocacy

Advocacy13
Entertainment

Where to Watch (US)

Stream
fuboTVfuboTVParamount Plus PremiumParamount Plus PremiumParamount Plus EssentialParamount Plus EssentialParamount+ Roku Premium ChannelParamount+ Roku Premium Channel
Rent
Amazon VideoAmazon VideoApple TV StoreApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeYouTubeFandango At HomeFandango At HomeJustWatch TVJustWatch TVFlixFlingFlixFlingSpectrum On DemandSpectrum On DemandPlexPlex
Buy
Amazon VideoAmazon VideoApple TV StoreApple TV StoreGoogle Play MoviesGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeYouTubeFandango At HomeFandango At Home

View streaming options ↗

Synopsis

After more than thirty years of service as one of the Navy's top aviators, Pete Maverick Mitchell finds himself training a detachment of TOP GUN graduates for a specialized mission the likes of which no living pilot has ever seen.

Score version: v1Data confidence: 100%How are scores calculated?

What did the audience think? Rate Top Gun: Maverick — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.

Lineage and popularity

No lineage or popularity yet

This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.

Compare Top Gun: Maverick

Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.

Compare with…

Advocacy Over Time in Action

The average advocacy score of Action titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.

25507519642026
Average advocacy score of Action titles by release year
YearAverage advocacyTitles
196432
196543
196604
196822
197002
197104
197232
197329
197503
197742
197923
198045
198143
198215
198337
1984411
198527
1986210
1987214
198814
1989110
199015
199119
199228
1993211
1994214
1995311
199619
1997413
1998210
1999313
2000111
2001220
2002317
2003414
2004319
2005418
2006323
2007318
2008322
200949
201078
2011512
2012910
2013716
2014109
20151016
2016209
20171417
20181520
20191618
20201413
20211425
20222032
20231725
20241232
2025535
2026530
This title (2022)131

● This title (2022): advocacy 13 · explore Action →

Cast & Crew

Scott Robertson (director) · Clint Wallace (director)