Made first for older women 1
The Ring's audience scores lean most toward older women at 59 of 100, with comparable appeal to young women 1. Its overall reach is rated mainstream — mainstream, general-audience reach 2. On content balance it reads entertainment-first at 0 of 100, weighting storytelling over explicit messaging 3.
- 1Audience scoreolder women 59 of 100 is the top quadrant, with young women 54 close behind.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 2ReachAudience breadth rated mainstream.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 3Content balanceContent balance entertainment-first at 0 of 100.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 53 — age-balanced
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience withheld
Only 70% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.
Why this is blank
A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Where to Watch (US)
Synopsis
Rachel Keller is a journalist investigating a videotape that may have killed four teenagers. There is an urban legend about this tape: the viewer will die seven days after watching it. Rachel tracks down the video... and watches it. Now she has just seven days to unravel the mystery of the Ring so she can save herself and her son.
What did the audience think? Rate The Ring — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Horror
The average advocacy score of Horror titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1932 | 3 | 2 |
| 1963 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 6 | 2 |
| 1972 | 1 | 4 |
| 1973 | 3 | 3 |
| 1975 | 4 | 2 |
| 1976 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 3 | 2 |
| 1978 | 0 | 5 |
| 1979 | 10 | 4 |
| 1980 | 4 | 3 |
| 1981 | 1 | 4 |
| 1982 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 3 | 2 |
| 1987 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 2 | 2 |
| 1990 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 2 | 3 |
| 1996 | 3 | 2 |
| 1997 | 2 | 6 |
| 1998 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 1 | 5 |
| 2000 | 1 | 5 |
| 2001 | 0 | 9 |
| 2002 | 1 | 8 |
| 2003 | 4 | 5 |
| 2004 | 2 | 10 |
| 2005 | 2 | 9 |
| 2006 | 3 | 9 |
| 2007 | 1 | 7 |
| 2008 | 2 | 5 |
| 2010 | 5 | 3 |
| 2016 | 8 | 3 |
| 2017 | 14 | 2 |
| 2018 | 12 | 2 |
| 2019 | 6 | 3 |
| 2020 | 26 | 3 |
| 2022 | 12 | 10 |
| 2023 | 8 | 5 |
| 2024 | 12 | 9 |
| 2025 | 2 | 18 |
| 2026 | 4 | 26 |
| This title (2002) | 0 | 1 |
● This title (2002): advocacy 0 · explore Horror →
Cast & Crew
Charles Gibson (director) · Giselle Gurza (director)