Made first for young men 1
The Nada Gang's audience scores lean most toward young men at 89 of 100, with comparable appeal to older men 1. Its overall reach is rated targeted — targeted reach aimed at a specific demographic segment 2. On content balance it reads entertainment-first at 0 of 100, weighting storytelling over explicit messaging 3.
- 1Audience scoreyoung men 89 of 100 is the top quadrant, with older men 84 close behind.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 2ReachAudience breadth rated targeted.WhatSphere audience model, score_version 1
- 3Content balanceContent balance entertainment-first at 0 of 100.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 48 — age-balanced
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience not shown
Not enough of the cast has a researched race to score this honestly (30% classified).
Why this is blank
Racial audience scores need at least half the actor cast classified. Below that line the page shows this note instead of a number. A blank is not a score of zero.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Synopsis
Nada, named after a gang of Spanish anarchists, is a small, confused band of French terrorists. They kidnap the American ambassador after one of his regular visits to an exclusive brothel. The gang starts to quarrel amongst themselves as to the diplomat's fate, while the police purge suspects in their attempts to destroy the Nada faction. As the violence escalates on both sides, the States and the terrorists are forced to use one another's methods in an increasingly desperate and relentless conflict.
What did the audience think? Rate The Nada Gang — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Thriller
The average advocacy score of Thriller titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1942 | 0 | 2 |
| 1944 | 1 | 2 |
| 1946 | 0 | 4 |
| 1947 | 0 | 2 |
| 1948 | 0 | 2 |
| 1949 | 0 | 2 |
| 1951 | 3 | 4 |
| 1954 | 9 | 2 |
| 1955 | 0 | 2 |
| 1956 | 2 | 3 |
| 1958 | 1 | 3 |
| 1959 | 2 | 3 |
| 1960 | 5 | 2 |
| 1963 | 2 | 4 |
| 1964 | 3 | 6 |
| 1965 | 6 | 2 |
| 1967 | 3 | 2 |
| 1968 | 1 | 4 |
| 1969 | 2 | 3 |
| 1970 | 0 | 3 |
| 1971 | 0 | 6 |
| 1972 | 1 | 5 |
| 1973 | 2 | 2 |
| 1974 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 4 | 5 |
| 1976 | 0 | 6 |
| 1978 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 5 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 2 | 5 |
| 1983 | 5 | 2 |
| 1984 | 4 | 6 |
| 1985 | 2 | 4 |
| 1986 | 4 | 6 |
| 1987 | 3 | 9 |
| 1988 | 2 | 2 |
| 1989 | 2 | 8 |
| 1990 | 2 | 8 |
| 1991 | 5 | 6 |
| 1992 | 4 | 6 |
| 1993 | 2 | 9 |
| 1994 | 3 | 7 |
| 1995 | 4 | 12 |
| 1996 | 2 | 11 |
| 1997 | 3 | 11 |
| 1998 | 2 | 11 |
| 1999 | 6 | 8 |
| 2000 | 2 | 12 |
| 2001 | 1 | 12 |
| 2002 | 2 | 12 |
| 2003 | 4 | 15 |
| 2004 | 2 | 14 |
| 2005 | 2 | 20 |
| 2006 | 4 | 24 |
| 2007 | 2 | 25 |
| 2008 | 2 | 17 |
| 2009 | 7 | 4 |
| 2010 | 12 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 | 5 |
| 2012 | 9 | 4 |
| 2014 | 6 | 6 |
| 2015 | 11 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7 | 2 |
| 2017 | 10 | 5 |
| 2018 | 8 | 4 |
| 2019 | 13 | 9 |
| 2020 | 3 | 3 |
| 2021 | 14 | 6 |
| 2022 | 10 | 9 |
| 2023 | 13 | 7 |
| 2024 | 16 | 16 |
| 2025 | 3 | 26 |
| 2026 | 3 | 33 |
| This title (1974) | 0 | 1 |
● This title (1974): advocacy 0 · explore Thriller →
Cast & Crew
Claude Chabrol (director) · Jean Rabier (director)