Research evidenceResearch evidence — scores and sourced research

Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 4

Its showrunner stated on the record that "parks had a mission, and the mission was to make people feel good, The point all along was to create a bunch of characters and stories that had heart and warmt…" 1. Its showrunner stated on the record that "nihilism and cynicism are always going to be an easier path because they require nothing of you except a shoulder shrug and an eyeroll, Other people matter — o…" 2. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 3. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 12 of 100 4. Relative to the expected cast make-up for its production origin, on-screen representation registers above the baseline for South Asian and White and below it for Hispanic 5.

The receipts — every claim above is sourced
  1. 1
    Creator statementshowrunner: "Parks had a mission, and the mission was to make people feel good. The point all along was to create a bunch of characters and stories that had heart and warmth behind them."Television Academy, Parks & Recreation at 15: Mike Schur Interview, 2024 source ↗
  2. 2
    Creator statementshowrunner: "nihilism and cynicism are always going to be an easier path because they require nothing of you except a shoulder shrug and an eyeroll. Other people matter — our reliance on other people and their re…"Peabody Awards, The Good Place Creator Michael Schur on Ethics, Civics, Optimism source ↗
  3. 3
    Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
  4. 4
    Content balanceAdvocacy 12 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
  5. 5
    RepresentationRepresentation vs production-origin baseline: South Asian 76, White 67, Hispanic 28.WhatSphere representation model, score_version 1

WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.

Data updated March 21, 2026Scored, pending verification.Think a score is wrong? Submit a correction.
Primary audienceYoung MenYoung Men74
Young MaleYoung FemaleMature MaleMature Female
Primary audienceYoung Men
Targeted

Quadrant Scores

Young Men
74
Young Women
70
Older Men
30
Older Women
26
Loading factors...

Audience Representation

White
67
Black
42
Hispanic
28
Asian
38
South Asian
76
Middle Eastern
48
Indigenous
48
Mixed
54
Other
48
LGBTQ+
0

Faithfulness

Faithfulness not applicable

Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.

Why this is blank

An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.

Advocacy

Advocacy12
Entertainment

Where to Watch (US)

Stream
Peacock PremiumPeacock PremiumPeacock Premium PlusPeacock Premium Plus
Buy
Amazon VideoAmazon VideoGoogle Play MoviesGoogle Play MoviesFandango At HomeFandango At Home

View streaming options ↗

Synopsis

In an attempt to beautify her town — and advance her career — Leslie Knope, a mid-level bureaucrat in the Parks and Recreation Department of Pawnee, Indiana, takes on bureaucrats, cranky neighbors, and single-issue fanatics whose weapons are lawsuits, the jumble of city codes, and the democratic process she loves so much.

Score version: v1Data confidence: 100%How are scores calculated?

What did the audience think? Rate Parks and Recreation — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.

Lineage and popularity

No lineage or popularity yet

This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.

Compare Parks and Recreation

Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.

Compare with…

Advocacy Over Time in Comedy

The average advocacy score of Comedy titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.

25507519142026
Average advocacy score of Comedy titles by release year
YearAverage advocacyTitles
191402
192503
193122
193302
193504
193702
194024
194102
194302
194426
194504
194702
194822
195024
195102
195204
1953010
195552
195633
195754
195806
195943
196025
1961510
196216
196316
196438
196519
196616
196807
196965
197037
197105
197216
197319
197418
197509
1976112
197747
197824
197918
198017
198119
1982510
1983112
1984210
1985314
1986020
1987017
1988113
1989224
1990121
1991114
1992017
1993120
1994525
1995319
1996415
1997222
1998324
1999336
2000333
2001131
2002132
2003229
2004240
2005441
2006244
2007153
2008020
2009418
2010210
2011221
2012110
20131013
2014511
201547
20161710
201767
20181012
2019716
2020619
2021919
20222022
20232211
20241217
2025223
2026236
This title (2009)121

● This title (2009): advocacy 12 · explore Comedy →

Cast & Crew