Scored entertainment-first on WhatSphere's content-balance model 3
Its director stated on the record that "i'm always trying to do 'Die Hard' over and over again, I'm getting closer now, I love like the regular character in extraordinary circumstances, Having that t…" 1. Its narrative-universality assessment registers 8 of 10 2. Taken together, the content-balance model places it entertainment-first at 7 of 100 3.
- 1Creator statementdirector: "I'm always trying to do 'Die Hard' over and over again. I'm getting closer now. I love like the regular character in extraordinary circumstances. Having that thriller with the pressure in like one da…"The Wrap, December 2024 source ↗
- 2Narrative universalityNarrative universality 8 of 10; identity centrality incidental.WhatSphere content assessment. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
- 3Content balanceAdvocacy 7 of 100, tier entertainment-first.WhatSphere content-balance model, score_version 1. Narrative universality 8/10 -> advocacy signal 22
WhatSphere presents the sourced record; it does not cast the judgement. Every statement above is drawn from a stored, sourced row — shown beside it — and nothing is asserted beyond what those receipts support.
Age: 46 — age-balanced
Quadrant Scores
Audience Representation
Racial audience withheld
Only 70% of the cast has a researched race, so these scores stay blank.
Why this is blank
A partial classification would pull origin-race scores toward the researched slice and away from the cast as it is. The nine audience scores are withheld instead of shown as zero. Zero would mean no audience, which is not what a thin cast record says.
Faithfulness
Faithfulness not applicable
Faithfulness is scored only for adaptations.
Why this is blank
An original has no source text to compare. The score is left blank rather than shown as zero.
Advocacy
Synopsis
An airport security officer races to outsmart a mysterious traveler forcing him to let a dangerous item slip onto a Christmas Eve flight.
What did the audience think? Rate Carry-On — every voice counts equally, no account needed. Clean reviews appear instantly.
Lineage and popularity
No lineage or popularity yet
This title has no Wikidata match, source work, or Steam player snapshot. A missing snapshot is not zero.
Put its audience profile side by side with any other title.
Advocacy Over Time in Thriller
The average advocacy score of Thriller titles by release year, with this title marked. Higher is more advocacy-driven.
| Year | Average advocacy | Titles |
|---|---|---|
| 1942 | 0 | 2 |
| 1944 | 1 | 2 |
| 1946 | 0 | 4 |
| 1947 | 0 | 2 |
| 1948 | 0 | 2 |
| 1949 | 0 | 2 |
| 1951 | 3 | 4 |
| 1954 | 9 | 2 |
| 1955 | 0 | 2 |
| 1956 | 2 | 3 |
| 1958 | 1 | 3 |
| 1959 | 2 | 3 |
| 1960 | 5 | 2 |
| 1963 | 2 | 4 |
| 1964 | 3 | 6 |
| 1965 | 6 | 2 |
| 1967 | 3 | 2 |
| 1968 | 1 | 4 |
| 1969 | 2 | 3 |
| 1970 | 0 | 3 |
| 1971 | 0 | 6 |
| 1972 | 1 | 5 |
| 1973 | 2 | 2 |
| 1974 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 4 | 5 |
| 1976 | 0 | 6 |
| 1978 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 5 | 2 |
| 1981 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 2 | 5 |
| 1983 | 5 | 2 |
| 1984 | 4 | 6 |
| 1985 | 2 | 4 |
| 1986 | 4 | 6 |
| 1987 | 3 | 9 |
| 1988 | 2 | 2 |
| 1989 | 2 | 8 |
| 1990 | 2 | 8 |
| 1991 | 5 | 6 |
| 1992 | 4 | 6 |
| 1993 | 2 | 9 |
| 1994 | 3 | 7 |
| 1995 | 4 | 12 |
| 1996 | 2 | 11 |
| 1997 | 3 | 11 |
| 1998 | 2 | 11 |
| 1999 | 6 | 8 |
| 2000 | 2 | 12 |
| 2001 | 1 | 12 |
| 2002 | 2 | 12 |
| 2003 | 4 | 15 |
| 2004 | 2 | 14 |
| 2005 | 2 | 20 |
| 2006 | 4 | 24 |
| 2007 | 2 | 25 |
| 2008 | 2 | 17 |
| 2009 | 7 | 4 |
| 2010 | 12 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 | 5 |
| 2012 | 9 | 4 |
| 2014 | 6 | 6 |
| 2015 | 11 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7 | 2 |
| 2017 | 10 | 5 |
| 2018 | 8 | 4 |
| 2019 | 13 | 9 |
| 2020 | 3 | 3 |
| 2021 | 14 | 6 |
| 2022 | 10 | 9 |
| 2023 | 13 | 7 |
| 2024 | 16 | 16 |
| 2025 | 3 | 26 |
| 2026 | 3 | 33 |
| This title (2024) | 7 | 1 |
● This title (2024): advocacy 7 · explore Thriller →
Cast & Crew
Jaume Collet-Serra (director) · Lyle Vincent (director)